<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for LKJ.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lkj.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lkj.net</link>
	<description>Technology blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:14:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on G-WAN super performance web server daemon by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2011/11/g-wan-super-performance-web-server-daemon/comment-page-1/#comment-3325</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 12:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lkj.net/?p=1903#comment-3325</guid>
		<description>There is a 64-bit release since G-WAN 3.0 which supports C, C++, Objective-C and D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a 64-bit release since G-WAN 3.0 which supports C, C++, Objective-C and D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on G-WAN super performance web server daemon by Lorn</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2011/11/g-wan-super-performance-web-server-daemon/comment-page-1/#comment-3318</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lkj.net/?p=1903#comment-3318</guid>
		<description>Starting with v3.x, G-WAN offer *both* 32-bit and 64-bit releases.

And G-WAN supports C, C++ and Objective-C/C++ *scripts*.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starting with v3.x, G-WAN offer *both* 32-bit and 64-bit releases.</p>
<p>And G-WAN supports C, C++ and Objective-C/C++ *scripts*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on G-WAN super performance web server daemon by Max</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2011/11/g-wan-super-performance-web-server-daemon/comment-page-1/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 12:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lkj.net/?p=1903#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s freeware with commercial support - not open source, and it is a web application server with lots of built-in unique features that beats the fastest web servers, web application accelerator and caching proxy server (nbonvin.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/serving-small-static-files-which-server-to-use/) even in it&#039;s 32bit release candidate version runing on a 64bit linux on a i3 laptop.

Because it&#039;s designed to scale on multi-core systems it will perform even faster on 480 core servers (forum.gwan.com/index.php?p=/discussion/569/many-core-coming-faster-then-you-may-think.-/) and even more so with the planned 64bit release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s freeware with commercial support &#8211; not open source, and it is a web application server with lots of built-in unique features that beats the fastest web servers, web application accelerator and caching proxy server (nbonvin.wordpress.com/2011/03/24/serving-small-static-files-which-server-to-use/) even in it&#8217;s 32bit release candidate version runing on a 64bit linux on a i3 laptop.</p>
<p>Because it&#8217;s designed to scale on multi-core systems it will perform even faster on 480 core servers (forum.gwan.com/index.php?p=/discussion/569/many-core-coming-faster-then-you-may-think.-/) and even more so with the planned 64bit release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on G-WAN super performance web server daemon by Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2011/11/g-wan-super-performance-web-server-daemon/comment-page-1/#comment-3285</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lkj.net/?p=1903#comment-3285</guid>
		<description>G-WAN is a freeware available for Windows (deprecated because of its kernel performance gap) and Linux (which has a much faster ans scalable kernel).

The G-WAN 64-bit release will be available by the end of December 2011.

This release brings scripts in C, C++, Objective-C and and a dozen of other programming languages like Fortran and Java will follow.

Python, Javascript, Google Go and Lua are already supported via G-WAN handlers (published on the site), making G-WAN the only Application server that supports so many programming languages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G-WAN is a freeware available for Windows (deprecated because of its kernel performance gap) and Linux (which has a much faster ans scalable kernel).</p>
<p>The G-WAN 64-bit release will be available by the end of December 2011.</p>
<p>This release brings scripts in C, C++, Objective-C and and a dozen of other programming languages like Fortran and Java will follow.</p>
<p>Python, Javascript, Google Go and Lua are already supported via G-WAN handlers (published on the site), making G-WAN the only Application server that supports so many programming languages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Boosting apache performance. Keepalive On or Off ? by Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2006/07/boosting-apache-performance-keepalive-on-or-off/comment-page-1/#comment-3279</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 05:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.httpblog.com/9#comment-3279</guid>
		<description>@vipin

it cannot be used in an .htaccess file</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@vipin</p>
<p>it cannot be used in an .htaccess file</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on G-WAN super performance web server daemon by Tech Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2011/11/g-wan-super-performance-web-server-daemon/comment-page-1/#comment-3274</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lkj.net/?p=1903#comment-3274</guid>
		<description>RE: BaT
Thanks for the post,  I didn&#039;t notice they offer 32-bit binary only...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: BaT<br />
Thanks for the post,  I didn&#8217;t notice they offer 32-bit binary only&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on G-WAN super performance web server daemon by BaT</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2011/11/g-wan-super-performance-web-server-daemon/comment-page-1/#comment-3258</link>
		<dc:creator>BaT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lkj.net/?p=1903#comment-3258</guid>
		<description>It possibly is the fastest web-server ATM, but I wouldn&#039;t call it Open Source.

It comes only as a Linux 32bit binary and not even available for 64bit and other platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It possibly is the fastest web-server ATM, but I wouldn&#8217;t call it Open Source.</p>
<p>It comes only as a Linux 32bit binary and not even available for 64bit and other platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10Mbps or 100Mbps up link port for a dedicated server by Keshav Shetty</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2007/07/10mbps-or-100mbps-up-link-port-for-a-dedicated-server/comment-page-1/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>Keshav Shetty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.httpblog.com/10mbps-or-100mbps-up-link-port-for-a-dedicated-server/#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the detailed info.
I am developing a interactive portal related to stock market.
Expecting 30 concurrent users of each request around 100KB.
i.e per second I expect around 30 requests.
The peak period will be around 9:00AM to 18:00PM.
What would you suggest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the detailed info.<br />
I am developing a interactive portal related to stock market.<br />
Expecting 30 concurrent users of each request around 100KB.<br />
i.e per second I expect around 30 requests.<br />
The peak period will be around 9:00AM to 18:00PM.<br />
What would you suggest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on vimService.wsdl CLI problems with Server version unavailable by Freaky</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2009/09/vimservice-wsdl-cli-problems-with-server-version-unavailable/comment-page-1/#comment-3239</link>
		<dc:creator>Freaky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vmtown.com/?p=15#comment-3239</guid>
		<description>Also caused by a perl module wanting to check the certificate (which are usually self-signed and will thus fail).

export PERL_LWP_SSL_VERIFY_HOSTNAME=0

should solve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also caused by a perl module wanting to check the certificate (which are usually self-signed and will thus fail).</p>
<p>export PERL_LWP_SSL_VERIFY_HOSTNAME=0</p>
<p>should solve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Personal skill development by Manu M N</title>
		<link>http://www.lkj.net/2007/03/personal-skill-development/comment-page-1/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Manu M N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 12:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.makewealth.com/blog/skill-development/personal-skill-development.html#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>Much better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

